Our shopping habits are seeing investors flock to new property types

Articles | 6 October 2017

The growth in health care, e-tailing and omni-channel retailing has been a major driver of the increased demand for logistics distribution centres – which is seeing the emergence of new property types for investors.

Take the United States for example, where net demand for warehousing has been elevated for the last four years at approximately 260 million (sqf) per annum or 2.1% of total market stock. E-commerce and retailing represents approximately 18% of all warehouse demand and 40% of all logistics demand.
As demand increases and tenants look to improve supply chain efficiencies, two new types of warehousing are in demand and evolving:

1. The emergence of smaller “Last Touch” distribution centres
With the growth in etailing and the problem of the “last mile” logistics, demand for these buildings is growing rapidly. Given the lack of available land and zoning constraints, these buildings are typically not purpose built. Located in urban infill locations in major cities, they are older buildings that have to be refurbished and adapted for the distribution of goods, which is far from ideal. Truck and light vehicle access is usually poor and inefficient, with low ceiling heights not providing for efficient racking systems.

2. The emergence of the modern fulfilment centre
Modern fulfilment centres are very large distribution and logistics warehouses. They are typically located on the outskirts of cities, where large tracts of land are available near major arterial roads. The buildings are typically constructed with concrete tilt-up wall panels, minimum 32 feet (10 metre) ceiling height, laser levelled seven-inch concrete flooring, sprinkler systems and storm water collection systems. The centres can have up to 1.2m (sqf) of lettable area (that is equivalent to 28 football fields). The centres usually specialise in either combined or specialised small and large parcel sorting, or large parcel non-sortable centres. Small parcel sorting centres can ship up to 15 million items per annum.

In Amazon’s latest generation of fulfilment centres, they have introduced the automated robotics Kiva System combined with eight miles of conveyor belts and a mezzanine floor. The system is made up of robots (automated guided vehicles) that locate and retrieve portable storage units, to deliver goods to human pickers that package the goods and place the package on a conveyor belt where it is automatically labelled and barcoded and directed to the relevant dispatch chute. A fulfilment centre can have over 2,000 robots operating at any one time. The robots come in two sizes with the larger size lifting up to 3,000 pounds.  They can travel at 1.3 meters per second. The robots are battery powered and will go and self-dock to be charged for 5 minutes every hour. Even with the automated robotics systems, the large fulfilment centres still need to employ up to 1,800 staff.

The value proposition for investors

The actual construction of a fulfilment centre is not expensive when compared to other types of real estate such as office buildings and shopping centres. While build costs do vary by country and state, in the US the base build cost is approximately $75 (psf). The build times are also much faster than the construction of office buildings and shopping centres. On a flat reticulated site, a fulfilment centre can be constructed in as little as six months.

The fitout of modern fulfilment centres actually costs materially more than the building itself. The fitout costs of an Amazon fulfilment centre in the US can cost up to $150 (psf), or $180m in total. In most instances the cost of the fitout is borne by the tenant. The tenant will own the fitout, and due to the large capital cost the lease lengths tend to be long, with 15 year leases not uncommon. The leases tend to have contracted fixed, or cpi linked, annual rental increases. All operating and maintenance costs for the building are typically paid by the tenant.

The pitfalls to watch out for
When looking to take advantage of the strong demand for supply chain logistics, by investing in buildings that are an integral part of the supply chain, clear distinctions need to be made. In areas where zoned land is readily available, barriers to entry can be low; the relatively cheap build cost allows for supply to easily increase which can restrict market rental growth. The ease of which new supply can be developed, leads to greater older building obsolescence, affecting the rentability of older stock as new modern buildings come online. As a city’s dynamics change, so can the demand for supply chain logistics. For example take the auto manufacturing industry. As demand for lower maintenance electric vehicles increases versus higher maintenance combustion engine vehicles, the demand for supply of auto parts decreases, leading to higher vacancy rates in distribution centres, as auto parts and suppliers shrink their tenanted footprint.

In areas located closer to city centres where population density increases, the availability of land reduces, land values increase, and so do the barriers to entry. Higher barriers to entry materially reduce the ability for new supply to compete with existing buildings. This leads to reduced older building obsolescence, higher market occupancy rates and, ultimately, greater rentability and higher market rental growth driving superior total returns. In these locations in dense cities like Tokyo and Hong Kong, where land values are very high, we are starting to see the emergence of multi-story distribution warehouses with raised external driveways for 17 metre trucks cascading up the buildings. As etailing and omni-channel retailing continues its growth trajectory and land values continue to increase in the world’s major cities, it won’t be long before multi-story distribution centres start appearing in other major cities around the globe.

How to invest in these emerging property types?
Listed property securities are a great way for investors to access profitable pockets of the property market. Head of Global Property Securities Stephen Hayes manages the Colonial First State Global Property Securities Fund. The strategy’s focus is on urban real estate located in the world’s most economically vibrant cities. They invest in listed assets that trade at a discount to direct property valuations.


This document is issued by Colonial First State Asset Management (Australia) Limited AFSL 289017 ABN 89 114 194311.This document is directed at persons of a professional, sophisticated or wholesale nature and not the retail market. This document has been prepared for general information purposes only and is intended to provide a summary of the subject matter covered. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to give advice. The views expressed are the views of the writer at the time of issue and may change over time. This is not an offer document, and does not constitute an offer, invitation, investment recommendation or inducement to distribute or purchase securities, shares, units or other interests or to enter into an investment agreement. No person should rely on the content and/or act on the basis of any matter contained in this document. This document is confidential and must not be copied, reproduced, circulated or transmitted, in whole or in part, and in any form or by any means without our prior written consent. The information contained within this document has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and accurate at the time of issue but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information. We do not accept any liability for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly from any use of this document. References to “we” or “us” are references to Colonial First State Global Asset Management (CFSGAM) which is the consolidated asset management division of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia ABN 48 123 123 124. CFSGAM includes a number of entities in different jurisdictions, operating in Australia as CFSGAM and as First State Investments (FSI) elsewhere. Commonwealth Bank of Australia (the “Bank”) and its subsidiaries are not responsible for any statement or information contained in this document. Neither the Bank nor any of its subsidiaries guarantee the performance of the fund or security or the repayment of capital. Investments in the fund or security are not deposits or other liabilities of the Bank or its subsidiaries, and the fund or security is subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Reference to specific securities (if any) is included for the purpose of illustration only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell. Reference to the names of any company is merely to explain the investment strategy and should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any of those companies. Copyright © (2017) Colonial First State Group Limited. All rights reserved.